Legal Opinion

Slater v. City of Grand Rapids

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929No. Docket No. 83, Calendar No. 34,454PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff’s husband, Samuel Slater, was a police officer in Grand Eapids. While attempting an arrest he was shot, his death resulting on December 9, 1921. An agreement for compensation under the workmen’s compensation act (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5458) was made, filed with the department of labor and industry and duly approved by it. The compensation provided was $14 per week for 300 weeks, and it has been paid in full by the defendant city. The charter of the city, adopted in 1917, provided a pension in such cases, to be paid to dependents, “including and not in addition to any amounts paid * *…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Port Huron Gas & Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Ford v. KuehneMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Duncan v. BinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Johnson v. City of MuskegonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Nelson v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Coates v. DrakeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. MacKay v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API