Legal Opinion

McMinn v. City of Little Rock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 12, 1982No. 82-20PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellants sought rezoning of their property from A single family to D apartment classification. The appellee’s planning staff and Commission recommended denial because it did not represent the best possible principles of land use planning. The City Board of Directors also denied appellant’s application for rezoning. The chancellor affirmed. For reversal the appellants contend that the appellee unreasonably and arbitrarily refused to rezone their property. They argue that the denial is based upon preventing other property in the area from being rezoned; that the city had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Little Rock v. BreedingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. City of North Little Rock v. HabrleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Downs v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  4. Taylor v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. WC McMinn Co., Inc. v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. SUMMIT MALL CO. LLC v. LemondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Second Baptist Church v. Little Rock Historic District CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Camden Community Development Corp. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Camden Community Development Corp. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. SUMMIT MALL CO. LLC v. LemondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API