Stoltz v. Stoltz
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Burr, Referee.
This is an undefended action for separation. On July 19, 1929, an order was duly made directing that service of the summons herein be made by publication. The defendant thereafter, and on the 29th day of July, 1929, ivas personally served without the State, to wit, at the Maplewood Club, Maplewood, N. EL Defendant has not appeared personally or by attorney. Plaintiff demands judgment of separation on the ground of abandonment and for alimony and costs.
The evidence presented warrants the judgment or decree of separation. The court has no power to grant the alimony sought in this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Rigney v. . RigneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.