Legal Opinion

Kinsley v. Atzingen

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 11, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

20 N.J. Super. 378 (1952)

90 A.2d 37

HELEN KINSLEY AND JOHN KINSLEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

WILLIAM VON ATZINGEN, WALTER VON ATZINGEN AND ERNEST ZIMA, DOING BUSINESS AS ATZINGEN WHITEHOUSE DAIRY, AND PHILIP TYSKEWICZ, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 16, 1952.

Decided July 11, 1952.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and GOLDMANN.

Mr. Aaron Gordon argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. George P. Moser argued the cause for respondents (Mr. William V. Roveto, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by McGEEHAN, S.J.A.D.

After the plaintiffs had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Saracco v. LyttleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Barbanes v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  3. Reti v. Vaniska, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Lomano v. Ideal Towel Supply Co.United States District Court · 1947
  5. Smith v. James J. McFeely, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zinck v. WhelanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  2. Genovay v. FoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Bryant v. Atlantic Car Rental, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. Wagner v. ArthurCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1956
  5. Robinson v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API