Legal Opinion
Saracco v. Lyttle
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 18, 1951PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
11 N.J. Super. 254 (1951)
78 A.2d 288
PHILLIP SARACCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SAMUEL LYTTLE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 18, 1950.
Decided January 18, 1951.
Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.
Mr. Charles C. Carroll argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Dominic Cavaliere, attorney).
Mr. Charles C. Stalter, attorney for and of counsel with defendants-respondents, argued the cause.
The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.A.D.
The plaintiff's suit was against defendant, Samuel Lyttle, as owner, and defendant,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. TheisenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Morril v. MorrilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
- Cuff v. Newark & New York RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1870
- Barbanes v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- John Cuff's Administrators v. Newark & New York RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1871
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Zinck v. WhelanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Genovay v. FoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Nat'l Prem. Budget Plan Corp. v. Nat'l Fire Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Corinti v. WittkoppMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Kiste v. Red Cab, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.