Legal Opinion

Giddy v. Shotts

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 15, 1926No. 8 Div. 855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

In October, 1924, appellee caused an execution to be levied on cotton in the seed as the property of Archie Giddy, defendant in the execution. Appellant interposed his clainx. On the trial of the right of property which ensued, appellee, plaintiff in execxxtion, had judgment.

Archie Giddy had raised the cotton on land rented by him, or by J. W. Giddy for him, from MeCuriey. Appellant contended that he had made advances to Ax-chie Giddy, his son, and, further, that he had bought the cotton from Archie. In the course of its ox-al charge, the court expressed its doubt whether the evidence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crawford v. KirkseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Cummings v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
  3. Mayer v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
  4. Upson v. RaifordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  5. Blocker v. BurnessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Woody v. Tucker, Willingham & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. White v. First Nat. Bank of OppSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API