Legal Opinion

Lee v. Winborn

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 17, 2020No. 3:17-cv-06065Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 JUDY K. LEE, CASE NO. 3:17-CV-6065-DWC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 12 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 MARY ELLEN WINBORN, CLALLAM COUNTY, 14 Defendant. 15 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73 and Local Rule MJR 16 13, the parties have consented to have this matter heard by the undersigned Magistrate Judge. 17 Dkt. 11. Currently before the Court is Defendants Mary Ellen Winborn and Clallam County’s 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 27. The Court concludes Plaintiff…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Ruston v. Town Bd. for Town of SkaneatelesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API