Legal Opinion
Flossie E. Lee v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General, and District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 27, 1989No. 89-5043, 89-5086PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA.
MIKVA, Circuit Judge:
This appeal requires us to consider when §§ 106, 110(b) and 110(d) of the National Historic Preservation Act (“NHPA”), codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 470f, 470h-2(b) and 470h-2(d) (1982), impose obligations affecting projects undertaken by the District of Columbia. The district court enjoined the federal and District appellants from proceeding with construction of a local prison before complying with these NHPA provisions because it found that the project had received various forms of federal assistance, 707 F.Supp. 600 (7th…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Common Cause v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Kent Edwards v. First Bank of Dundee, an Illinois State BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Techworld Development Corp. v. D.C. Preservation LeagueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- Lee v. ThornburghDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
3Cited by33 opinions
- Coalition for Underground Expansion v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Shanks v. DresselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Boarhead Corporation v. Edwin B. Erickson, Region Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Village of Los Ranchos De AlBuquerque v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Sugarloaf Citizens Ass'n. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.