Bailey v. Happer
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
William Bailey, Sr. v. Jamia Happer, No. 0685, September Term, 2024. Opinion by Getty, Joseph M., J. HEADNOTES: SAFE ACT – RETROACTIVE APPLICATION The SAFE Act may not be applied retroactively. However, a statute does not operate retroactively merely because it is applied in a case arising from conduct antedating the statute’s enactment. Therefore, a court is permitted to consider an alleged exploiter’s entire course of conduct, including conduct which occurred before the effective date of the statute, when evaluating a SAFE Act claim. SAFE ACT – BURDEN OF PROOF A claim of financial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Cunningham v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Walter v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.