Legal Opinion

State v. Halbakken

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 30, 1981No. 9167-1-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

— Defendant Eric Andrew Halbakken was charged with driving while intoxicated and being a minor in possession or consumption of intoxicants. Halbakken moved to dismiss the charges, contending that he was denied his right to assistance of counsel at a critical stage of a criminal proceeding. When Halbakken was taken to the Bothell Police Department, he refused to sign the acknowledgment and waiver of his constitutional rights on the arrest report, stating, "I don't understand nothing." Halbakken also refused to sign the implied consent warning, and to take a Breathalyzer test.

At the hearing on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of Tacoma v. HeaterWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Washington v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Wolf v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  2. State v. KronichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. State v. KronichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Juckett v. Evergreen District CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. State v. TellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API