Legal Opinion
Kamine/Besicorp Allegany L.P. v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided November 2, 1995No. 6:95-cr-06045PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
This is an antitrust action brought by plaintiff, Kamine/Besicorp Allegany L.P. (“Kamine”), against defendant Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation (“RG & E”). Ka-mine, which seeks both damages and injunc-tive relief, asserts causes of action under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, and Sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15, 26.
The facts of this case have been set out at some length in a prior decision of this court, 1 and will be repeated here only as necessary. In short, the case arises from RG & E’s unwillingness…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Telecor Communications, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Steward Health Care System, LLC v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2014
- Crossroads Cogeneration Corp. v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.