Legal Opinion

Hiatt v. USA (TV2)

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided April 20, 2022No. 3:19-cv-00392Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE JAMES EDWARD HIATT, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Nos.: 3:19-CV-392-TAV-DCP ) 3:16-CR-24-TAV-DCP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This action is before the Court on petitioner’s pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

[Doc. 1]1 and motion to amend [Doc. 16]. With respect to the § 2255 motion, the government filed a response [Doc. 9], and petitioner filed a supplement [Doc. 7] and a reply [Doc. 17]. These motions are now ripe for resolution. Based on the record before…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API