Xerox Corp. v. Department of Taxation & Finance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*946A party aggrieved by an administrative determination generally must " 'exhaust all possibilities of obtaining relief through administrative channels before appealing to the courts’ ” (Young Men’s Christian Assn. v Rochester Pure Waters Dist., 37 NY2d 371, 375). That rule applies to a taxpayer challenge to determinations of the State Tax Commission (Allstate Ins. Co. v Tax Commn., 67 NY2d 999, 1001; Slater v Gallman, 38 NY2d 1, rearg denied 39 NY2d 832; Hahn v State Tax Commn., 134 AD2d 904). Plaintiff has been unable to establish any exception to the exhaustion doctrine which would allow it…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Engel v. LightermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Rochester Pure Waters DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- GTE Spacenet Corp. v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. ERIE COUNTYAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015