Legal Opinion
Dawson v. Entek International
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 26, 2009No. Civil 08-6151-AAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AIKEN, District Judge:
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, defendant moves for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims for employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and Or.Rev.Stat. § 659A. Defendant also moves for summary judgment on plaintiffs state claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress, reckless infliction of emotional distress, and wrongful discharge. For the reasons set forth below, the defendant’s motion is granted in its entirety and this case is dismissed.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff was employed at defendant Entek…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dawson v. Entek InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Freyd v. Univ. of Or.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Nogowski v. St Charles Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023