Legal Opinion
Gallen v. HOWARD D. JOHNSON COMPANY
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 31, 1967No. 67 Civ. 83, 67 Civ. 808PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BONSAL, District Judge.
Defendants Howard D. Johnson Company, Howard Johnson’s Motor Lodges, Howard Johnson Incorporated of Florida, and Howard Johnson Company (the Howard Johnson defendants) move for an order consolidating the above named actions pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; dismissing the actions for improper venue or, in the alternative, transferring the actions to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division, pursuant to Rule 12 (b) (3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1406(a) or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Oil & Gas Ventures-First 1958 Fund, Ltd. v. KungDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- United States v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Saminsky v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Maheu v. Reynolds & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Y4 Design, Ltd. v. Regensteiner Publishing Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Blumenthal v. Management Assistance, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Harry Rich Corporation v. Curtiss-Wright CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.