Legal Opinion
Hogan v. Astrue
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 19, 2007No. 04-CV-6356LPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that Deborah Hogan (“plaintiff’) is not disabled under Title II of the Social Security Act, and therefore, is not entitled to Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSD”) benefits.
Both plaintiff and the Commissioner have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.CivP. 12(c). For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs motion (Dkt.# 3) is granted in part, the Commissioner’s motion…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Ronald E. Veino, Sr. v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Rockwood v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Wojciechowski v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Kessler v. ColvinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Henry v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- Goodale v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.