Lau v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action in case for personal injuries. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. McKenzie Cleland, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Chytraus
delivered the opinion of the court.
The undry concrete sidewalk at the time and place in question was certainly not reasonably safe for public travel. The jury were clearly justified in finding and returning a verdict, in effect, that permitting persons to use the sidewalk, at the time and place in question, for public travel, was a lack of exercise of ordinary care on the part of whoever was charged with the duty to then and there exercise such care in order to prevent injury to persons rightfully using the sidewalk.
We regard the city of Chicago as liable, and,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chicago Economic Fuel Gas Co. v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Village of Jefferson v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Hogan v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Schmidt v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Wagoner v. BlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Coultas v. City of WinchesterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1956