Legal Opinion
Driskel v. O'Connor
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 26, 1940No. Appeal, 21PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Pattebson,
Claiming to be the legally constituted school directors of the school districts of Allegheny and Munster Townships, appellants, Michael Driskel et al., seek to enjoin appellees, Albert L. O’Connor et al., from interfering with them in the exercise of their rights and the performance of their duties as such. Appellees claim that, by virtue of proceedings, the validity of which is attacked by appellants, in which the two districts in question joined with the School District of Clearfield Township and the School Districts of the Boroughs of Loretto and Chest…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Meriwether v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Minsinger v. RauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Pittsburg's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. McCreary v. MajorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Prichard v. Willistown Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Overman v. State Board of ControlSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Ryder AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Braddock Township AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.