Legal Opinion

In Re Anthony R. Martin-Trigona

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 9, 1986No. 85-5023, 85-5024, 85-5025, 86-5010, 86-5003, 86-5009, 86-7091, 85-5063, 85-5077, 86-5004, 86-5007, 86-5015, 86-5018, 86-5022, 86-5023, 86-8015, 86-5024, 86-5025, 86-5026, 86-5017, 86-5014PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

Before us are various motions and petitions submitted by Anthony R. Martin-Tri-gona, pro se, seeking, inter alia, leave to appeal various orders entered in his bankruptcy proceeding, reinstatement of appeals that have been dismissed, or other relief. We generally dispose of such motions by unpublished order, but on this occasion we issue a published opinion discussing his conduct and the consequences thereof in the future.

Martin-Trigona’s propensity for generally meritless, usually vexatious and often scurrilous resort to legal processes has been documented in our prior decisions. See, e.g.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Irwin Schiff v. Simon & Schuster, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Johl v. JohlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In Re Anthony R. Martin-Trigona, Movant. In Re George Sassower, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Irwin A. Schiff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Ahneman v. AhnemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Covanta Onondaga Limited Partnership v. Onondaga County Resource Recovery AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. Ramin v. RaminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API