Legal Opinion
Johl v. Johl
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 11, 1986No. 1030, Docket 85-7957PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant is a pro se litigant with a long record of frivolous and vexatious proceedings in this court. We have in the past imposed sanctions upon him for filing vexatious and frivolous motions or appeals. Johl v. Town of Groton, Dkt. No. 81-7569; Johl v. Moukwasher, Dkt. No. 81-7567; Johl v. Johl, Dkt. No. 81-7327; Johl v. Town of Groton, Dkt. No. 79-6257.
*76The present appeal, taken from a wholly justified dismissal for failure to prosecute, is again frivolous and vexatious. We therefore affirm and impose damages in the amount of $2000 plus double costs. Rule 38, Fed.R.App.P. The clerk of this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Irwin Schiff v. Simon & Schuster, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
3Cited by13 opinions
- Richardson Greenshields Securities, Inc. v. Mui-Hin Lau, Ho Sih Fong, Kau-Ying Lau, Ying Lup Lau, and Wai Yau ChiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Irwin A. Schiff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- In Re Anthony R. Martin-TrigonaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- John M. And Alice D. Church v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Young v. Beugen (In Re Beugen)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.