Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Hunter v. Ferebauer
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 19, 2013No. 30768-9-IIIPublished
1ConcurrenceFearing, J.
¶19 (concurring) — An appeals court judge is taught to avoid placing in an opinion facts unnecessary to the decision. I violate this instruction and write separately to voice the inequity suffered by appellant Michael Hunter. I also write separately because I consider the appeal merits additional analysis.
*10¶20 The parties agree that Michael Hunter is the father of Infant F, despite the mother, Michelle Ferebauer, being married to another. The infant was conceived in Washington State. Over a period of months thereafter, Ferebauer and Hunter participated in an unsettled relationship. On February…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.