Legal Opinion

Stugard v. Stugard

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stanley Harwood, J.

Motion by plaintiff for an order of exclusive occupancy and an order of protection is respectfully referred to Special Term, Part V, for hearing and determination. The cross motion by defendant for immediate sale of the marital residence is denied.

Plaintiff and defendant Stugard were married in 1945, are each in their late sixties, and each claims to be in ill health. Two actions for divorce were commenced in this court, one by plaintiff, the other by defendant Stugard; each were dismissed for failure of proof. By the judgment entered January 5, 1979,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kahn v. KahnNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Seitz v. DrogheoNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Long v. LongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Hite v. HiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Anello v. AnelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sedgh v. SedghNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  2. De Cillis v. De CillisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API