Legal Opinion
Franklin v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided December 27, 1995No. 09-94-110 CRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
913 S.W.2d 234 (1995)
Frederick FRANKLIN, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 09-94-110 CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.
Submitted June 21, 1995.
Decided December 27, 1995.
Chris Flood, DeGuerin & Dickson, Houston, for appellant.
John B. Holmes, District Attorney, Houston, for state.
Before WALKER, C.J., and BURGESS and STOVER, JJ.
OPINION
STOVER, Justice.
This is an appeal from a felony conviction for possession, with intent to deliver, of a controlled substance. Subsequent to the trial court's denial of appellant's two motions to suppress, the case proceeded to trial before a jury…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.