Legal Opinion

Town of Ophir v. Jorgensen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1924No. 4103PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, District Judge.

The defendants were convicted before the justice of the peace of Tooele precinct, Tooele county, on a charge of violating an ordinance of the town of Ophir relating to befouling the waters of the stream from which the inhabitants of the town secure their water for domestic and culinary purposes. From the judgment entered upon that conviction they appealed to the district court of Tooele county, were there tried before the court sitting without a jury, and were ordered discharged and their bondsmen released on the ground that the ordinance under which they were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ogden City v. CrossmanUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Salt Lake City v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Richardson v. CapwellUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Castle Dale City v. WoolleyUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Salina City v. FreeceUtah Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Marquette v. Police CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Scipio, a Municipal Corp. v. Grantly OlsenUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State v. JaegerUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. JaegerUtah Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API