Legal Opinion

Mori v. Mori

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1997No. 950331PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON CERTIORARI TO THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

RUSSON, Justice:

We granted certiorari to review a decision of the court of appeals holding that plaintiffs complaint failed to state an actionable claim and remanding the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Mori v. Mori, 896 P.2d 1237, 1238 (Utah App.), cert. granted, 910 P.2d 425 (Utah 1995). We are also asked to review the court of appeals’ holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing alternative service of process upon defendant by serving his secretary, receptionist, or wife. Id. We reverse.

FACTS

Toshiko Sasai…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Dewey Baker v. Director, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  3. Shui King Tam Wong, Gong Yuen Wong, Wing Sun Wong v. Griffin B. Bell, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Mckinney v. State Of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. H.U.F. v. W.P.W.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. MacArthur v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Lenchyshyn v. Pelko Electric, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Trillium USA, Inc. v. Board of County CommisionersUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Society of Lloyd's v. ReinhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API