Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Tennessee Valley Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 16, 1936No. 8 Div. 670PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
Petition for mandamus to require that a certain action instituted by Mary Vellisarian against the Tennessee Valley Bank be transferred from the law side of the circuit court of Morgan county to the equity docket, and to grant defendant’s (in said law case) motion filed in the circuit court for that purpose.
For a proper review of the questions, petitioner has pursued the appropriate remedy. Smith v. Grayson, 214 Ala. 197, 107 So. 448; Ex parte Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., 211 Ala. 531, 100 So. 843; Jones v. Wright, 220 Ala. 406, 125 So. 645.
In the motion for a transfer,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Doty v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ex parte JonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. ShikleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Montgomery B. & T. Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Cogburn v. CallierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Esslinger v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Quinn v. HannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- The Commercial Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Gregory v. MitchellDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1978
- City of Bessemer v. GoodwynSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.