Legal Opinion

The State of Montana v. Eli Lilly and Company

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 5, 2025No. 2:23-cv-04214Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE: INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION Case No. 2:23-md-03080 (BRM)(LDW) MDL No. 3080 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: OPINION The State of Montana, ex. rel. Austin Knudsen, Attorney General v. Eli Lilly and Company, et al. Case No. 2:23-cv-04214 MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendants Eli Lilly and Company’s (“Eli Lilly”), Sanofi-Aventis US LLC’s (“Sanofi”), and Novo Nordisk Inc.’s (“Novo Nordisk”) (together, the “Manufacturer Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss1 Plaintiff State of Montana’s (the “State”) First…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API