Legal Opinion

Alexander v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1917No. 4619Published

Appeal from District Court, Runnels County; J. O. Woodward, Judge. H. F. Alexander was convicted of an offense, and lie appeals.

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

In view of appellant’s earnest contention that the motion for new trial, based upon the action of the trial court in overruling the application for a continuance, should have been granted, we have carefully reviewed the matter.

The motion for continuance contained the allegation that Dameron, a witness named therein, would testify that Docia Alexander, the daughter of appellant with whom the incest is charged to have taken place, had asked the witness to procure poison that she-might administer it to her father. On the *295motion for new trial, appellant set up the fact…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Elizando v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
  2. Hinman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Schackey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Singleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API