Legal Opinion

Arms. v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 8, 2015No. CR-15-124Published

1Concurrence · BrillHoward W. Brill, Chief Justice

|9I agree with the majority that this case should be reversed and dismissed. I write separately to set forth my rationale.

Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-13-210(b) (Repl. 2013) states that

[i]t is unlawful for any person to administer or cause to be ingested, inhaled, or otherwise introduced into the human body of another person a controlled substance as defined by the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, § 5-64-10Í et seq., unless the controlled substance has been ordered for the person receiving the controlled substance by a licensed practitioner, licensed by the state to prescribe…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Wood.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. AKA v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. CollierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Sparrow v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API