Legal Opinion

United States Life Insurance v. Ettinger

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for the appointment of a receiver in foreclosure.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

It appears affirmatively from the opposing affidavits, without denial by the applicant, that the taxes upon the mortgaged premises have been fully paid; that the interest upon the bond and mortgage in suit was met when last due; that the persons liable for the debt are solvent, and that the premises in question are adequate security. The plaintiff relies solely upon *379the covenant contained in the mortgage, which virtually mortgages the rents and profits of the premises and permits the appointment of a receiver without regard to the solvency of the mortgagees or the value of the mortgaged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. KruppAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Brick v. HornbeckNew York Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Degener v. StilesNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. BroekerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Mortgage Union of Penn. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API