Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Dunbar

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 18, 1982No. 39,770; ACM 22652Published

1ConcurrenceCook, Judge

The majority correctly observe that a conspirator is prosecutable “for substantive offenses which were committed pursuant to the conspiracy and to carry out its objectives.” 12 M.J. 218, 220. Here, the allegations of the conspiracy specification (specification 3, Charge II) are, in material part, that the accused did “conspire ... to commit an offense ... to wit: the sale of a habit forming narcotic drug, cocaine.” (Emphasis supplied.) In my opinion, the allegations limit the objective of the criminal agreement to a single sale. It may be that the limitation was inadvertent, but the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. FoutUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. SubiaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  3. United States v. DunbarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API