Legal Opinion

United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land Situate in Village of Farmingdale

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 16, 1941No. 465PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion for an order directing the petitioner-plaintiff to serve a verified bill of particulars of the allegations of the petitioner-plaintiff in this action and to set forth in said bill of particulars the following particulars:

“As to the Allegations Contained in Paragraph ‘IP of the Amended Petition:
“1. State the express purpose or purposes for which the lands are alleged to be necessary to be acquired for the public use for military purposes.
“2. State when the lands were first deemed necessary to be acquired for the public use for public purposes.
“3.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Old Dominion Land Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Barnidge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  5. United States v. ThrelkeldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Saucier v. CrichtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  2. United States v. 12,918.28 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1943
  3. United States v. 2,049.85 Acres of Land, More or LessDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1943
  4. United States v. 247 Acres of Land, More or LessDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Lambert v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API