Legal Opinion

Lovelass v. Sword

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2004No. 28896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

This case involves an attempt to enforce an alleged oral agreement for the sale and purchase of real property.

I

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On or about May 8,1997, Gary and Carole Sword entered into an agreement with Keith Lovelass to purchase the real property which ■is the subject of this action. At the time of this agreement, Keith Lovelass represented to the Swords that he owned the property. In fact he did not own the property. Keith Lovelass and Mr. Sword executed a written memorandum, providing as follows:

Sold to Keith Lovelass, 1978 GMC P.U. VIN# TKL148J506028, for the sum of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Marshall v. BlairIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Tew v. ManwaringIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Fuchs v. LloydIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Robbins v. County of BlaineIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dominguez v. Evergreen Resources, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Read v. HarveyIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Gibson v. Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Owsley v. Idaho Industrial Com'nIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Fisk v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API