Legal Opinion

Tew v. Manwaring

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1971No. 10543PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEAR, Justice.

This action arises out of an alleged breach by Elwood Manwaring, respondent, of a contract to purchase a house from Robert and Noma Tew, appellants. From a finding by the district court that no bind ing contract existed, Mr. and Mrs. Tew have appealed to this court.

On November 7, 1963, the Tews, Man-waring, and Mr. and Mrs. Elwin Loveland entered into a written real estate exchange contract drawn by Manwaring, as the real estate broker, under which the Lovelands would purchase the Tews’ home and sell to the Tews their home, and Manwaring would then purchase the Loveland home…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Swain v. SeamansSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Big Butte Ranch, Inc. v. GrasmickIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Boesiger v. FreerIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Stone v. BradshawIdaho Supreme Court · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. SV Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Peasley Transfer & Storage Co. v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Haskin v. GlassIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. International Business MacHines Corp. v. LawhornIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Frantz v. ParkeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API