Legal Opinion

Smith v. Harrington

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWm. E. Lee, J.

— The respondent purchased a binder and truck from, appellant, under two certain conditional sale notes or contracts, in each of which he promised to pay the sum of $150 and interest. The contracts contained the following provisions:

“I agree that the title thereto .... shall remain the property of W. I. Smith .... until this and all other notes given for the purchase price shall have been paid in money. If I fail to pay this note when due .... the holder of this note may seize and sell the same at public or private sale, with or without notice, pay all expenses thereby incurred, and apply the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Walker v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Continental Guaranty Corp. v. Peoples Bus LineSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
  3. Christie v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Hill v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Merrill v. Fremont Abstract Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Welles v. Acree Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Graves v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API