Quint v. Dimond
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Glenn County and from an order denying a new trial. Oval Pirkey, Judge. ■ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an action to recover damages for the burning and destruction of certain wheat and fences growing and being on land of plaintiff. At the time of the fire which destroyed plaintiff’s said property defendants were operating a combined harvester propelled by a traction engine on land of one Jenkins adjoining that of plaintiff; and it is averred that a fire was caused on this adjoining land by sparks from said engine; that this fire, in spite of all -efforts to suppress it, spread onto plaintiff’s land and destroyed his said wheat and fences; and that the fire was -caused by the imperfect…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Carpenter v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- People v. Chin Mook SowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hirshfeld v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Holmes v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- In Re Estate of NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Estate of HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bryant v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.