Legal Opinion
Richard Curtis Apgar, Also Known as James Edwin Hallidy v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 12, 1971No. 20287PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, District Judge.
This is an appeal in forma pauperis from a judgment and sentence based upon a jury verdict finding Richard Curtis Apgar guilty under an information charging him and two co-defendants with armed robbery of a federally insured bank in Velva, North Dakota, in violation of 18 U.S.C., Sections 2113(a) and (d). 1 Apgar’s motion for acquittal made at the close of all the evidence was denied by the District Court 2 The only issue which we consider on appeal is whether the Government sustained its burden to introduce sufficient evidence on the question of Apgar’s sanity to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Archibald Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Wilfredo Alvarez Appeal of John A/K/A Jorge MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. James E. McCrackenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- George M. Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. James NeavillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. GreenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.