Legal Opinion

United States v. James Neavill

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 1, 1989No. 87-2692PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

James Neavill was convicted of threatening to take the life of the President, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 871(a).1 He now appeals, arguing that the jury should have been instructed as to the consequences of a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity, that the jury was incorrectly instructed about the mens rea of the offense, that the evidence was legally insufficient, and that certain evidence was erroneously admitted. Because the jury should have been told about the implications of reaching a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity, we reverse and remand for a new…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Archibald Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  5. Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Allan Blume, Toby Pett, Roger Ward, David BianchiniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. James A. Fisher, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. John Wesley ManningCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Kolby KristiansenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. BellrichardDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API