Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Gill

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 26, 1945No. 8811PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILDER, Associate Justice.

Appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, addressed to the District Court, was accompanied by a pauper’s oath. The petition was permitted to be filed without prepayment of costs, but (lie writ was denied. Petitioner then requested reconsideration of the order or, in the alternative, leave to appeal as a pauper. The trial judge certified 1 that the application was not in good faith and denied the request. Thereafter, petitioner, by a letter addressed to the Chief Justice of this Court, sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis, on appeal. We appointed counsel…

2Cases cited166 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. Sears v. Catholic Archdiocese of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API