Legal Opinion

Riendeau v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 25, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 09-0202, 1 CA-CV 09-0203PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KESSLER, Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiff Leonard Riendeau (“Husband”) and Plaintiff H. Lorraine Riendeau (“Wife”) separately appeal the superior court’s judgment against them. We consolidate their appeals on our own motion pursuant to Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure (“ARCAP”) 8(b). 1 This case presents the issue of whether the tardy filing of a cost bond on appeal from compulsory arbitration renders the appeal jurisdictionally defective. We hold that it does not.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Husband and Wife filed a complaint in the superior court alleging that they each suffered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barassi v. MatisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. McHazlett v. Otis Engineering Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Abril v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  4. Ronan v. First National Bank of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Joe P. Guinn & State Farm v. SchweitzerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Natasha S. v. Dep't of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  3. In Re Reynaldo P.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. Johnson v. GravinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API