Legal Opinion

Meyer Material Co. v. Mooshol

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 4, 2002No. 00 C 7025PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CASTILLO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Meyer Material Company (“Meyer”) filed suit against Defendants Beniss Mooshol (“Beniss”), Christine Mooshol (“Christine”), Christina’s Closet, Ltd. (“CCL”) and BCD Group (“BCD”), alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. This Court dismissed Meyer’s RICO claims in open court and held that evidence of multiple illegal acts in furtherance of a single kickback scheme involving one victim does not constitute the “pattern of predicate acts” required by the RICO…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Margaret Morgan and Burton Morgan v. Bank of Waukegan, a Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Melvin P. DeutschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. BarrDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  2. EQ Financial, Inc. v. Personal Financial Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  3. 3BTech Inc v. GarelickDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  4. First Business Specialty Finance, LLC v. Marcus Treiber, Eryn Appell, and EMT Holdings LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
  5. Glen Flora Dental Center, Ltd. v. First Eagle BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API