Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Luz Solla v. Elizabeth Berlin

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2015No. 24PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, petitioner’s application for attorneys’ fees denied, and the certified question answered in the negative.

After the New York City Human Resources Administration (HRA) reduced petitioner’s shelter allowance, she requested a “fair hearing” before the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance (OTDA). At the hearing, HRA, a city agency, agreed to reverse its decision and restore petitioner’s lost benefits retroactively. OTDA, a state agency, issued a “Decision After Fair…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Auguste v. HammonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. The People v. Chris PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Matter of Clarke v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Matter of Criss v. New York State Dept. of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. Matter of Liu v. RuizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. Matter of Liu v. RuizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API