Legal Opinion
McNeil v. Legislative Apportionment Commission
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 31, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
828 A.2d 840 (2003)
177 N.J. 364
Anne M. McNEIL, Thomas E. Williams, Roseanna Siebert, Paul Digaetano and Kevin O'Toole, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
The LEGISLATIVE APPORTIONMENT COMMISSION OF the STATE of New Jersey, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Regena L. Thomas, Secretary of State of New Jersey and Peter C. Harvey, Acting Attorney General of New Jersey, Defendants-Respondents.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued April 28, 2003.
Decided July 31, 2003.
Sam Hirsch, a member of the District of Columbia and Maryland bars and Leon J. Sokol argued the cause for appellant (Sokol, Behot and Fiorenzo, Scarinci &…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited84 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Daewoo Electronics America Inc. v. Opta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017