Darby v. Crossno
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
The complaint alleged that "defendant owes plaintiff $500 principal plus interest and attorney fees on a note, copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit A.” The exhibit shows the payee of the note to be "E. H. Darby d/b/a E. H. Darby & Co.” The complaint was styled "E. H. Darby & Company, plaintiff, vs. James T. Crossno, defendant.” Plaintiff offered an amendment to the style of the case (the only place, other than the exhibit, where a *390plaintiff is designated by name) to read "E. H. Darby d/b/a E. H. Darby & Co.” The trial court, on motion, disallowed the amendment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Dalton Marble WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Haynes v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- John L. Hutcheson Memorial Tri-County Hospital v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Parker v. KilgoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Wadley, Jones & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.