Legal Opinion

Sphatt v. Roth

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

Plaintiffs herein do not dispute the facts found by the trial court. The sole question involved is as stated by plaintiffs: “Was there a dona fide sale of the property herein to the defendants or their agent?” This question was answered, “Yes” by the trial court and judgment entered in favor of the defendants. The defendants asked for a review of that part of the judgment denying defendants a brokerage commission and awarding the plaintiffs the sum of $500. We shall discuss these questions in the above order.

On October 31, 1945, Wenzel R. Sphatt and Mary C. Sphatt, his wife, and William Roth…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Friend v. YahrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Pederson v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Estate of NolsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Coryell v. BluettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Hustad v. DrivesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hilboldt v. Wisconsin Real Estate Brokers' BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. (1972), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API