Legal Opinion

Kiely Corp. v. Gibson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1964No. Civ. 28273PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiff sued for damages for breach of a construction subcontract; judgment was entered in favor of the defendant. Thereafter plaintiff moved for a new trial; the motion was granted upon grounds of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decision and that the judgment was “against law.” Defendant appeals from the resulting order.

The subcontract was for demolition, site clearance and other work connected with the construction of an elementarv school in Torrance for which project plaintiff had been awarded the general contract. Bids were invited, and the low bid was eventually…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Collins v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. American National Bank of San Francisco v. A. G. Sommerville, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. White v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. NicholsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Beynon v. Garden Grove Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Walker v. Stauffer Chemical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Russell v. SoldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API