Legal Opinion

Beaumont v. Sharpless

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1911No. Appeal, No. 183PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, No. 183, Oct. T., 1910, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Chester .Co., Oct. Term, 1909, No. 6, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Charles 0. Beaumont, trading as Joseph Oat & Son, v. William Sharpless and W. Warren Sharpless, trading as W. W. Sharpless Company. Assumpsit for labor and material.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 183, Oct. T., 1910, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Chester .Co., Oct. Term, 1909, No. 6, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Charles 0. Beaumont, trading as Joseph Oat & Son, v. William Sharpless and W. Warren Sharpless, trading as W. W. Sharpless Company. Assumpsit for labor and material. Before Butler, J. The court charged in part as follows: The plaintiff, who is Charles 0. Beaumont, trading as Joseph Oat & Sons, has brought this suit against William Sharpless and Warren Sharpless, trading as the Sharpless Company, Ltd., to recover $772.83, with interest from. August 1,…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The basis of the plaintiff’s claim is an account which he held against a firm of which he was a member. In the prosecution of the business of that firm it was deemed advisable to procure a motor truck and this the plaintiff bought. The partnership having been dissolved by an agreement in writing the plaintiff afterward brought this action to recover the price of the truck and some repairs made on it. Two objections are made to the judgment appealed from: first, that an action of assumpsit cannot be maintained by one member of a firm against his copartners or former…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thompson v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Crow v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Hamilton v. WellsIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Leidy v. MessingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  5. Murray v. HerrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frazier v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Wathen v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Koenig v. Currans Restaurant Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Davis v. McCartyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Davis v. McCartyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API