Legal Opinion

United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Kaiyo Maru No. 53, With Its Fishing Gear, Furniture, Appurtenances, Stores, Fish, Cargo, Cross-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 23, 1983No. 81-3273, 81-3293PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:

INTRODUCTION

The Japanese stern trawler KAIYO MARU NO. 53 (“KAIYO”) was seized for failing to log a large quantity of fish and for taking prohibited species in violation of the Fishery Conservation and Management Act (“FCMA” or “the Act”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1821,1857. The district court imposed a $450,000 penalty, rejecting the government’s contention that the penalty must equal the vessel’s full value. The district court also rejected the vessel owners’ (“claimants”) arguments that the Coast Guard’s search and seizure of the vessel violated the fourth and fifth amendments.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Eagle Eye Fishing Corporation v. United States Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  2. Matthew Tarabochia v. Mickey AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Lopez-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Neem Shiva Dass and Ma Surina Dasi, Marvin Neer, Gerald TerpakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. James ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API