United States v. Allan Anthony Burnim
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Burnim appeals from his conviction for unarmed bank robbery, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He was found guilty after a court trial at which the only contested issue was his sanity at the time of the offense. We affirm the conviction.
The question presented is neatly posed by the trial judge’s special findings of fact:
1. The Court finds that the defendant is guilty as charged of bank robbery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2113(a).
2. The Court finds that at the time of the offense, the defense [sic] suffered from an organic brain defect.
3. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Don Wade v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Charles Anthony HartfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Coe Kane v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Aubrey Kenneth PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Harry Ernest MeekerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. FreeIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. Glenn Randal FoppeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Commonwealth v. SheehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- United States v. William Howard NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Carolyn LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.