Legal Opinion

Salomon v. Eli Lilly and Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 5, 1984PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

In their complaint, plaintiffs seek damages for personal injuries to plaintiff Susan Salomon caused by her mother’s use of diethylstilbestrol (DES) during her pregnancy with Susan. On its own motion, the trial court dismissed the complaint. We granted direct certification, 97 N.J. 594 (1984).

Without specifically pleading any particular theory of recovery, plaintiffs instituted this action against defendants as a class. On appeal, however, plaintiffs rely upon four theories to support their complaint. One theory is that defendants may be liable when, in pursuing a common scheme, any of them…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Namm v. Charles E. Frosst & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Coyle v. Englander'sNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. G.D. v. KennySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  3. Vuocolo v. Diamond Shamrock Chem.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  4. Driscoll Const. Co., Inc. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  5. Rubanick v. Witco Chemical Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API